
Energy Policy · Fuel Prices · Jones Act · Maritime Shipping
The Trump administration is considering a 30-day waiver of the Jones Act, allowing foreign-flagged vessels to transport energy products between U.S. ports, in response to surging fuel prices driven by Middle East conflict and Strait of Hormuz disruptions.
However, U.S. shipping interests, maritime labor unions, and industry economists strongly oppose the move, arguing it would have negligible impact on consumer gasoline prices. They contend that crude oil costs, not domestic shipping, are the primary price driver.
Analysis by Overseas Shipholding Group CEO Sam Norton suggests foreign-flag tankers could even be more expensive for domestic routes (e.g., 14.5 cents/gallon vs. 13.5 cents/gallon Houston-New York) due to tight global markets.
Navigistics Consulting estimates a maximum theoretical reduction of only $0.0027 per gallon, noting that only about 6.5% of U.S. gasoline moves via Jones Act tankers. Critics also warn a waiver would undermine American maritime jobs, security, and investment, with potential savings likely captured by traders rather than consumers.
While Senator Ted Cruz supports the waiver for national security, the prevailing industry view is that the policy risks doing more harm than good to the domestic maritime sector without meaningfully alleviating pump prices.