Collaboration · Innovation · Patent Outcomes · R&D Strategy
A 2010 study by Jasjit Singh of INSEAD and Lee Fleming of Harvard Business School, published in Management Science, definitively concludes that collaborative invention significantly increases the probability of breakthrough innovations and simultaneously reduces the likelihood of poor outcomes, based on an analysis of over half a million patented inventions.
The research, authored by Singh and Fleming, challenges prior assumptions that a higher chance of breakthroughs inherently comes with a greater risk of failures. Their analysis demonstrates that collaboration offers a dual benefit: more rigorous selection processes mitigate poor results, while increased recombinant opportunities in creative search drive extreme successes.
Specifically, individuals working alone, particularly those without organizational affiliation, are less likely to achieve breakthroughs and more prone to producing particularly poor inventions. The study further identifies that the diversity of technical experience among team members and the size of their external collaboration networks partially mediate these effects, with experience diversity being more effective at preventing poor outcomes than at generating breakthroughs.

The loss of small perks and rise of AI have conspired to strip work of all joy, making the office ‘feel like a funeral.’